6 responses so far ↓

• 1 karajima2

  There are way too many usage and grammatical errors. I suggest working this out with your teacher.

• 2 Chaz

  wow u did well 4 it not being ur first language i corrected it in microsoft word an now this is it!

  Trading junk

  The article explains how the U.S.A and other countries, like China, are doing a great business.
  It develops the advantages and downsides for both USA and trash demanding countries.

  Indeed, the big deal realised between the USA and these countries brings good sides to the two camps;
  On the one hand, The USA can import cheap plastic toys, tainted pet food, lead-laced toys for very cheaper than they could produce these things.
  On the other hand, there is a rise of the export of trash materials to China, Korea, Latin America countries and also European countries, due to the rise of the demand.
  This junk is reused in these countries, and that’s better than incinerate the trash, which is armful for our environment.
  All this involves a booming scrap global trade; many countries demand scraps and others will putting them out. It has a certain number of advantages;
  First, it’s good for shareholder and people who want see benefits, because the price of the junk is rising and also because recycling is more profitable than producing.
  Secondly, it’s good news for the tree-huggers. A bit of junk reused by these countries is one less scrap incinerated or sanded to a landfill, which increase the global warming.
  Thirdly, developed countries are going to develop more-efficient equipments in order to be more effective in recycling and separating materials processes.
  Unfortunately, there are also downsides brought by the boom of global trash trade;
  the thieves see now a good reason for steal scrap materials in order to sell them and this global trade won’t be enough to prevent global warming, we must do more efforts.

  To conclude, we can say that in the future, when middle-developed countries like China and India will have they own recycling industry, these countries will ask to Europe and the USA for know-how.
  And then our countries will export not only junk, but junk management too.

• 3 Bloke_Quote

  ellos, its his loockin veri mucho goods to me. i ham engleesh by tha wayy. wells doon to yous

• 4 Azul Watson

  nice!! i ? it!!!

• 5 Jake Uden

  Indeed, the big realization between the USA and other countries brings good sides to two camps; On the one hand, the USA can import cheap plastic toys, tainted pet food, and lead-laced toys for much less than they could produce them. On the other hand, there is an increased exportation of waste materials to China, Korea, Latin American countries and also European Countries, due to the rise in demand for (consumer products (could put something else here)).
  This junk is reused in these countries, which is better than incinerating the trash and being harmful to the environment.
  All this involves a booming scrap global trade; many countries demand scrap materials and others are putting them out. It has a certain number of advantages:
  First, it’s good for shareholders and people who want to see the benefits because the price of these scrap materials is on the rise and recycling is more profitable than producing.
  Secondly, it’s good news for the tree-huggers. A bit of junk reused by these countires is a bit less junk incinerated or placed in a landfill, which in turn increases global warming.
  Thirdly, developed countries are going to develop more efficient equipment in order to be more effective in recycling and seperating materials.
  Unfortunately, there are also downsides brought by the boom of global trash trade. The thieves now can see a good reason to steal scrap materials and than sell them for their own profit. This practice won’t be enough to prevent global warming: We must increase our efforts!

  In conclusion, we can say that in the future, when middle-developed countries like China and India will have their own recycling industries, they will ask Europe and the USA for the know-how.
  And then our countries will not only be exporting junk, but junk management, too.

  There are quite a few errors in this. I went ahead and rewrote it as best I could, but it would be good to get together with someone who can explain each change to you.

• 6 odimwitdwon

  Summary:

  Trading junk

  The article explains how the U.S.A. and other countries, such as China, are profiting in the trash trade. It develops the advantages and disadvantages for both the U.S.A. and trash demanding countries.

  Indeed, the { I don’t understand what you mean by “big deal” - do you mean “important treaty”? “important contract” “large trade agreement”?} realized between the U.S.A. and these countries brings benefits to the two sides:
  On one hand, the U.S.A. can import cheap plastic toys, tainted pet food, lead-laced toys costing much less than if they produced these things themselves.
  There is also a rise of the export of trash materials to China, Korea, Latin American countries and also European countries, because of the rise in the demand for raw materials.
  This junk is recycled in these countries. This is better than incinerating the trash, which is harmful to our environment.
  All this involves a booming global trade in scrap. Many countries demand scrap and others provide it to them. This has a certain number of advantages:
  First, it’s good for companies selling the scrap because the price of the junk is rising. It is also good for companies using it because recycling is less expensive than producing from basic raw materials.
  Secondly, it is good news for environmentalists. A bit of junk reused by these countries is one less piece incinerated (which increases global warming) or sent to a landfill (which can cause water and soil pollution).
  Third, developed countries are developing more-efficient equipment to be more effective in recycling and separating materials.
  Unfortunately, there are also downsides brought by the boom of global trash trade. Thieves see now a good reason to steal and sell scrap materials. Also, this global trade won’t be enough to prevent global warming, we must {make more effort} or {do more}.

  In the future, when developing countries like China and India have their own recycling industry, they will ask Europe and the U.S.A. for know-how. Then our countries will export not only junk, but junk management too.